logo

  • Academia Sinica / 
  • Sitemap / 
  • MH Login / 
  • 中文
  • 正體中文
    English
search
  • Events
    • >  News
    • >  Academic
  • About IMH
    • >  Introduction
    • >  Director’s remarks
    • >  Organization
    • >  Advisory board
    • >  Research plans
    • >  Research findings
    • >  Honors
    • >  Admin Staff
  • People
    • >  Research fellows
    • >  Corresponding Research Fellows
    • >  Adjunct research fellows
    • >  Postdoctoral fellows
    • >  Doctoral candidate fellows
    • >  Research Groups
  • Activities
  • Publications
    • >  Historical sources
    • >  Monographs
    • >  Bulletin
    • >  RWMCH
    • >  Conference Volumes
    • >  Other publications
    • >  Hu Shih Publications
    • >  eBooks
    • >  Non-IMH publications
    • >  Search
    • >  Order
  • Academic exchanges
    • >  List of Partner Institutions
    • >  Visiting scholars
    • >  Life and work
    • >  Visiting scholars program
  • Resources
    • >  Research Resources Links
    • >  Special displays
    • >  Video
    • >  Picture of the Day
  • Contact
    • >  Subscribe our RSS
    • >  FAQ
    • >  Contact us

 

Home > Activities

Civilization vs. Essence-Function (Tiyong): Tianyan lun (On Heavenly Evolution) and the Post-1895 Debate on the Primacy of Technology over Science in China

arrow iconDate(s): 2024/10/24

arrow iconTime: 10:00~12:00

*Venue: Archives 2nd Conference Hall

*Speaker:Prof. Sean Hsiang-lin LEI ( Research fellow and Director, IMH, AS )

*Disscussant: Prof. Peter Zarrow ( Department of History, NCONN )

*Organizer: IMH

Abstract,
The current article begins by presenting a revisionist account of one of the most influential books in modern Chinese intellectual history, Yan Fu’s 嚴復 (1854–1921) Tianyan lun 天演論 (On Heavenly Evolution), published in 1898 as the Chinese translation of Thomas Huxley’s Evolution and Ethics (1893). Scholars have yet to recognize that Yan Fu intended Tianyan lun to serve as a “science-based discourse of civilization.” To that end, Yan created twin concepts—zhihua 治化and zhigong治功—to translate the notion of civilization into Chinese, thereby constructing a coherent discourse of civilization that laid the foundation for Liang Qichao’s well-known advocacy. What Yan sought to achieve with Tianyan lun was to create dual breakthroughs: advancing a conception of science endowed with cultural authority and facilitating the acceptance of civilization discourse in late Qing China.



arrow iconPhotos:
event photo
event photo
event photo
event photo

Return
FB網站 RSS 2010優勝網站

Copyright 2016, Institute of Modern History, Academia Sinica. All Rights Reserved.

128 Academia Rd, Sec. 2, Nankang, Taipei 115201, Taiwan Tel:886-2-2782-4166 Fax:886-2-2789-8204

Privacy policy

Profile Protection