logo

  • Academia Sinica / 
  • Sitemap / 
  • MH Login / 
  • 中文
  • 正體中文
    English
search
  • Events
    • >  News
    • >  Academic
  • About IMH
    • >  Introduction
    • >  Director’s remarks
    • >  Organization
    • >  Advisory board
    • >  Research plans
    • >  Research findings
    • >  Honors
    • >  Admin Staff
  • People
    • >  Research fellows
    • >  Corresponding Research Fellows
    • >  Adjunct research fellows
    • >  Postdoctoral fellows
    • >  Doctoral candidate fellows
    • >  Research Groups
  • Activities
  • Publications
    • >  Historical sources
    • >  Monographs
    • >  Bulletin
    • >  RWMCH
    • >  Conference Volumes
    • >  Other publications
    • >  Hu Shih Publications
    • >  eBooks
    • >  Non-IMH publications
    • >  Search
    • >  Order
  • Academic exchanges
    • >  List of Partner Institutions
    • >  Visiting scholars
    • >  Life and work
    • >  Visiting scholars program
  • Resources
    • >  Research Resources Links
    • >  Special displays
    • >  Video
  • Contact
    • >  Subscribe our RSS
    • >  FAQ
    • >  Contact us

 

Home > Activities

“Western Learning” as Environmental History

arrow iconDate(s): 2026/03/26

arrow iconTime: 10:00~12:00

*Venue: Archives 3rd Conference Hall

*Host: Prof. Fu Jia-Chen(Associate research fellow, IMH, AS)

*Speaker:Prof. David Bello(Director of East Asian Studies; Professor of History, Washington and Lee University)

*Organizer: Western Learning and China Research Group

Abstract:
The presentation first briefly surveys development of western concepts of environmental history, from a deterministic practice before the 1960s to one now emphasizing contingency and inter-dependence between social (human) and ecological (natural) systems. The presentation then summarizes some of my latest work on the environmental statecraft-governance of the Qing Dynasty (1644-1911), exemplifying more recent trends. Chinese empire is reconsidered not as ethnic administration or elite politics or economic exchange or cultural pursuits. Instead, the empire becomes an environmental integration of Qing diversity’s human social and ecological elements—one way “to reconcile old empire-centered and nation-centered narratives with indigenous and nonstate space and territoriality . . . and embrace more nuanced definitions of power” (Hämäläinen and Truett, “On Borderlands”). Integration was effected through a legacy network of environmental infrastructures operating regionally in agricultural (China proper), agro-pastoral (Xinjiang) and pastoral modes (Qinghai-Tibet) that concentrated and buffered vital resources—including crops, livestock, water and grass—against environmental disruption. These infrastructures simultaneously mediated interactions between various peoples and ecologies (including climate, disease and even distance) to leverage the immense diversity of human and natural resources, realized through Qing unification of Inner Asia and China proper. The diversity orchestrated by such infrastructures was the foundation of Qing resilience.



Return
FB網站 RSS 2010優勝網站

Copyright 2016, Institute of Modern History, Academia Sinica. All Rights Reserved.

128 Academia Rd, Sec. 2, Nankang, Taipei 115201, Taiwan Tel:886-2-2782-4166 Fax:886-2-2789-8204

Privacy policy

Profile Protection