logo

  • Academia Sinica / 
  • Sitemap / 
  • MH Login / 
  • 中文
  • 正體中文
    English
search
  • Events
    • >  News
    • >  Academic
  • About IMH
    • >  Introduction
    • >  Director’s remarks
    • >  Organization
    • >  Advisory board
    • >  Research plans
    • >  Research findings
    • >  Honors
    • >  Admin Staff
  • People
    • >  Research fellows
    • >  Corresponding Research Fellows
    • >  Adjunct research fellows
    • >  Postdoctoral fellows
    • >  Doctoral candidate fellows
    • >  Research Groups
  • Activities
  • Publications
    • >  Historical sources
    • >  Monographs
    • >  Bulletin
    • >  RWMCH
    • >  Conference Volumes
    • >  Other publications
    • >  Hu Shih Publications
    • >  eBooks
    • >  Non-IMH publications
    • >  Search
    • >  Order
  • Academic exchanges
    • >  List of Partner Institutions
    • >  Visiting scholars
    • >  Life and work
    • >  Visiting scholars program
  • Resources
    • >  Research Resources Links
    • >  Special displays
    • >  Video
  • Contact
    • >  Subscribe our RSS
    • >  FAQ
    • >  Contact us

 

Home > Publications > Monographs

Debating Neo-Confucian Ritual Othodoxy: Evidential Studies and the Reconstruction of Social Relations in Eighteenth-Century China封面


Debating Neo-Confucian Ritual Othodoxy: Evidential Studies and the Reconstruction of Social Relations in Eighteenth-Century China
ISBN:957-671-816-3
ISBN:957-671-817-1
Author(s):Chang So-an
Date: 2001
  • Hardcover:n.a.   
  • Softcover:n.a.   
  • Price: 未出版
    Pages:496
    Vol.: 0
    Size: 25 K

    Abstract:
    This book discusses the rites thought of the 18th century, one the one hand focusing on the disparities between Qing-era Confucian rites thought and the rites thought under the Song and Ming concept of Heavenly Principle, including the areas of principle and system, in order to observe the context in which any possible breakthroughs could have occurred in the rites thought of the 18th century. On the other hand, it also pays attention to all of the doubts about the patriarchal order and the idea of patriarchy raised by the intellectuals of the 18th century. These doubts left a huge open space, responses offering multiple possible directions for transforming old knowledge and citing new knowledge.
    Return
    FB網站 RSS 2010優勝網站

    Copyright 2016, Institute of Modern History, Academia Sinica. All Rights Reserved.

    128 Academia Rd, Sec. 2, Nankang, Taipei 115201, Taiwan Tel:886-2-2782-4166 Fax:886-2-2789-8204

    Privacy policy

    Profile Protection