logo

  • Academia Sinica / 
  • Sitemap / 
  • MH Login / 
  • 中文
  • 正體中文
    English
search
  • Events
    • >  News
    • >  Academic
  • About IMH
    • >  Introduction
    • >  Director’s remarks
    • >  Organization
    • >  Advisory board
    • >  Research plans
    • >  Research findings
    • >  Honors
    • >  Admin Staff
  • People
    • >  Research fellows
    • >  Corresponding Research Fellows
    • >  Adjunct research fellows
    • >  Postdoctoral fellows
    • >  Doctoral candidate fellows
    • >  Research Groups
  • Activities
  • Publications
    • >  Historical sources
    • >  Monographs
    • >  Bulletin
    • >  RWMCH
    • >  Conference Volumes
    • >  Other publications
    • >  Hu Shih Publications
    • >  eBooks
    • >  Non-IMH publications
    • >  Search
    • >  Order
  • Academic exchanges
    • >  List of Partner Institutions
    • >  Visiting scholars
    • >  Life and work
    • >  Visiting scholars program
  • Resources
    • >  Research Resources Links
    • >  Special displays
    • >  Video
    • >  Picture of the Day
  • Contact
    • >  Subscribe our RSS
    • >  FAQ
    • >  Contact us

 

Home > Events > Academic

1906年大清《破產律》的立法與爭議

arrow iconDate(s): 2018/08/28

arrow iconTime: 14:30~16:30

*Venue: Research 1st Meeting Room

*Speaker:Dr. Zhang Shi-hui(Associate professor, School of History and Culture, Shandong Normal University)

*Organizer: State and Society Research Group

摘要:1906年大清《破產律》是中國第一部成文破產法,是清末《商律》的重要組成部分。但與《公司律》、《商人通例》只是模仿域外商法不同,《破產律》立法還是對18世紀以來債法變革的承續。《破產律》立法是在商部和法部合作下完成,有著兩部門自身的考慮,即解決破產糾紛和追求現代法治。《破產律》頒佈後,引起了商界(以錢業為主)紛爭,其主要原因是法學家追求與清末商情、世情的疏離。最終,《破產律》以“統籌編纂”名義收回,但清末民初實際商事審判中依然發揮著作用,並對1935年《破產法》立法有很多影響。此外,以《破產律》承前啟後,縱觀古今債法之演進,其中存在著一貫制之的精神。



arrow iconPhotos:
event photo
event photo
event photo
event photo

Return
FB網站 RSS 2010優勝網站

Copyright 2016, Institute of Modern History, Academia Sinica. All Rights Reserved.

128 Academia Rd, Sec. 2, Nankang, Taipei 115201, Taiwan Tel:886-2-2782-4166 Fax:886-2-2789-8204

Privacy policy

Profile Protection