logo

  • Academia Sinica / 
  • Sitemap / 
  • MH Login / 
  • 中文
  • 正體中文
    English
search
  • Events
    • >  News
    • >  Academic
  • About IMH
    • >  Introduction
    • >  Director’s remarks
    • >  Organization
    • >  Advisory board
    • >  Research plans
    • >  Research findings
    • >  Honors
    • >  Admin Staff
  • People
    • >  Research fellows
    • >  Corresponding Research Fellows
    • >  Adjunct research fellows
    • >  Postdoctoral fellows
    • >  Doctoral candidate fellows
    • >  Research Groups
  • Activities
  • Publications
    • >  Historical sources
    • >  Monographs
    • >  Bulletin
    • >  RWMCH
    • >  Conference Volumes
    • >  Other publications
    • >  Hu Shih Publications
    • >  eBooks
    • >  Non-IMH publications
    • >  Search
    • >  Order
  • Academic exchanges
    • >  List of Partner Institutions
    • >  Visiting scholars
    • >  Life and work
    • >  Visiting scholars program
  • Resources
    • >  Research Resources Links
    • >  Special displays
    • >  Video
    • >  Picture of the Day
  • Contact
    • >  Subscribe our RSS
    • >  FAQ
    • >  Contact us

 

Home >

Public Welfare and State Legitimation: Early Modern England (1533-1780), Japan(1640-1895), and China (1684-1911)

arrow iconDate(s): 2019/12/24

arrow iconTime: 10:00~12:00

*Venue: Research 1st Meeting Room

*Speaker:Prof. He, Wenkai (Associate Professor, Division of Social Science, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology)

*Organizer: Urban History Research Group

Abstract:

Studies of state formation in political science and sociology have often focused upon how and why states developed centralized institutions to extract revenues for fighting wars. But the research on state formation has paid scant attention to the process of legitimating state power. This neglect leaves social scientists few intellectual tools to make sense of the emergence and consolidation of the early modern state. In this project, I argue that the early modern state as an impersonal apparatus of governance was common to Tudor and early Stuart England, Tokugawa Japan, and Qing China. The personal charisma of the monarch or the divine source of the ruler’s power could no longer justify the state’s coercive power. Instead, state power was legitimated by public goods provision through various social policies. The public goods were closely connected to the general welfare of the subjects, which included famine relief, financing large-scale public works, as well as state reaction to popular petitions that touched on domestic welfare issues. I demonstrate a similar pattern of state-society negotiation based upon a commonly accepted concept of public welfare across these three cases, as well as the role of non-material public good in the transformation from early modern to modern politics in England and Japan, but not in China.



Return
FB網站 RSS 2010優勝網站

Copyright 2016, Institute of Modern History, Academia Sinica. All Rights Reserved.

128 Academia Rd, Sec. 2, Nankang, Taipei 115201, Taiwan Tel:886-2-2782-4166 Fax:886-2-2789-8204

Privacy policy

Profile Protection