logo

  • Academia Sinica / 
  • Sitemap / 
  • MH Login / 
  • 中文
  • 正體中文
    English
search
  • Events
    • >  News
    • >  Academic
  • About IMH
    • >  Introduction
    • >  Director’s remarks
    • >  Organization
    • >  Advisory board
    • >  Research plans
    • >  Research findings
    • >  Honors
    • >  Admin Staff
  • People
    • >  Research fellows
    • >  Corresponding Research Fellows
    • >  Adjunct research fellows
    • >  Postdoctoral fellows
    • >  Doctoral candidate fellows
    • >  Research Groups
  • Activities
  • Publications
    • >  Historical sources
    • >  Monographs
    • >  Bulletin
    • >  RWMCH
    • >  Conference Volumes
    • >  Other publications
    • >  Hu Shih Publications
    • >  eBooks
    • >  Non-IMH publications
    • >  Search
    • >  Order
  • Academic exchanges
    • >  List of Partner Institutions
    • >  Visiting scholars
    • >  Life and work
    • >  Visiting scholars program
  • Resources
    • >  Research Resources Links
    • >  Special displays
    • >  Video
  • Contact
    • >  Subscribe our RSS
    • >  FAQ
    • >  Contact us

 

Home >

The Chinese Experience of Alienating Temporality and Its Global Significance

arrow iconDate(s): 2026/09/21

arrow iconTime: 15:00~17:00

*Venue: Archives 3rd Conference Hall

*Host: Prof. Chen Chien-shou (Associate research fellow and Director of Hu Shih Memorial Hall)

*Speaker:Prof. Thomas Fröhlich(德國漢堡大學中國語言文化學系教授)

*Organizer: Hu Shih Research Group;Chiang Kai-shek Research Group

Abstract:
The dissemination of the linear-teleological conception of history, which assumed its modern form during the European Enlightenment, exerted a profound influence on Chinese views of modernity. Eurocentric entanglements arising from the introduction of the linear-teleological conception of history have been famously examined by postcolonial studies concerned with modern India. A Eurocentric problematic can also be identified in the case of China. Yet modern China differs in significant respects from the Indian case, such that a mere transposition of the findings of postcolonial studies would be inadequate. Both the emergence and the effects of the modern vision of historical temporality in China require further in-depth consideration in scholarship on modern China. Nor does the influential thesis of Eisenstadt, according to which so-called multiple modernities emerge in non-Western societies adequately account for the specific features of Chinese understandings of modernity. In order to delineate fundamental characteristics of Chinese modernity, a shift in perspective is therefore required—one that centers on the modern Chinese experience of an alienating temporality. This perspective has been envisaged by neither postcolonial studies nor the theory of multiple modernities nor previous research on Chinese responses to the West.



Return
FB網站 RSS 2010優勝網站

Copyright 2016, Institute of Modern History, Academia Sinica. All Rights Reserved.

128 Academia Rd, Sec. 2, Nankang, Taipei 115201, Taiwan Tel:886-2-2782-4166 Fax:886-2-2789-8204

Privacy policy

Profile Protection