logo

  • Academia Sinica / 
  • Sitemap / 
  • MH Login / 
  • 中文
  • 正體中文
    English
search
  • Events
    • >  News
    • >  Academic
  • About IMH
    • >  Introduction
    • >  Director’s remarks
    • >  Organization
    • >  Advisory board
    • >  Research plans
    • >  Research findings
    • >  Honors
    • >  Admin Staff
  • People
    • >  Research fellows
    • >  Corresponding Research Fellows
    • >  Adjunct research fellows
    • >  Postdoctoral fellows
    • >  Doctoral candidate fellows
    • >  Research Groups
  • Activities
  • Publications
    • >  Historical sources
    • >  Monographs
    • >  Bulletin
    • >  RWMCH
    • >  Conference Volumes
    • >  Other publications
    • >  Hu Shih Publications
    • >  eBooks
    • >  Non-IMH publications
    • >  Search
    • >  Order
  • Academic exchanges
    • >  List of Partner Institutions
    • >  Visiting scholars
    • >  Life and work
    • >  Visiting scholars program
  • Resources
    • >  Research Resources Links
    • >  Special displays
    • >  Video
    • >  Picture of the Day
  • Contact
    • >  Subscribe our RSS
    • >  FAQ
    • >  Contact us

 

Home >

Chinese Character Simplification and the Publishing Industry, 1935–1936

arrow iconDate(s): 2021/12/08

arrow iconTime: 15:00~17:00

*Venue: Archives 1st Conference Hall+Virtual Meeting

*Host: Prof. Mårten Söderblom Saarela(Associate research fellow, IMH)

*Speaker:Prof. Jeffrey Weng(Assistant Professor of Sociology, National Taiwan University)

*Organizer: Western Learning and China Research Group

*List of participants: 報名表清單

※ 視訊與會,僅限「與會名單」人員與會。
※ 將於會議前一天,依「與會名單」,寄送視訊會議連結。

*Webex Meetings 操作說明及FAQ

Simplified characters were first implemented as official policy under the Nationalist government in late 1935. Less than four months later, in early 1936, the policy was rescinded. The existing historiography emphasizes the role of conservative ideological opposition in simplification’s demise. However, the practical difficulties of simplification need also to be considered. While promulgating simplification, the government also mandated the use of the new phonetic symbols (注音符號) in pedagogical publications. These two simultaneous demands on publishing companies imposed costs that neither the industry nor the government was willing to bear. Based on previously overlooked archival documents, along with an examination of the financial positions of the leading firms and the constraints of the national budget, I argue that simplification’s failure should be attributed not only to ideological opposition, but also to the material and financial constraints of both the government and the companies most directly responsible for its implementation. Ideological concerns, therefore, are inseparable from their material context.

(Forthcoming in the Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies.)



Return
FB網站 RSS 2010優勝網站

Copyright 2016, Institute of Modern History, Academia Sinica. All Rights Reserved.

128 Academia Rd, Sec. 2, Nankang, Taipei 115201, Taiwan Tel:886-2-2782-4166 Fax:886-2-2789-8204

Privacy policy

Profile Protection